Demanding Justice In UN ! !

During a speech at UN in 2010, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Iran president addressed very important issues, he first started with Pakistan flood, tried to attract UN attention to one of the recent disasters, in my own opinion UN and totally world failed at helping Pakistanis, talking too much but without proper action, although I blame Pakistan government too for their mismanagement.... I have noticed that most countries which claim sending aid packages to other needy states..they all brag about nothing ...they send almost nothing ....or they delay at even sending less than their promises ..as a matter of fact ... they do that for their publicity , and I strongly believe even if they help, those donors donate only for their own interest and they have no good intention at all, for example Americans think their country is the most generous country in the world, i am sure they know that USA has always helped less than her promises , they look at these aids as trade... don't u think so??

The second issue that Ahmadinejad spoke about was greedy states mass murdering people of the world occupying other nations lands colonizing them within the history and now they are also supporting occupiers of Palestine ,

the above picture says a lot about bestiality of Zionist regime. as well as its supporters.

He then proposed  some segments within the US government  orchestrated  the 9 11 attack to reserve the American  economy and its grips  on the Middle East in order to save Zionist regime .

I found it  very brave reaction to the truth ,he condemned  terrorism and  terrorists , asking UN  to establish  a fact finding  group for the events  of 9 11 and its post events  which affected  millions of us, so that in future  expressing views about it  is not forbidden  and they won't make it  as holy as holocaust  to justify killing and murdering  innocent nations. 

The forth parts of his speech  which I found interesting  was 2011 as "Nuclear energy for all  and Nuclear weapon for none", although United Nation  is more likely for a few nation  like USA and Zionist regime, as long as they own nuclear weapons, moreover each of them has used it , one with dropping  nuclear bombs  openly,   the other using radioactive bullets against Palestinians, 

 finally he addressed burning Holy Quran in the US under the protection of the police,he showed an islamic reaction  by :    "

"  On behalf o f the Iranian nation I pay respect to all Divine Books and their followers. This is the Quran and this is the Bible. I pay respect to both o f them."

 

Nuclear Israel is more dangerous than Iran

Iran submitted its proposal package to P5+1 yesterday on Wednesday providing opportunities to have a new round of negotiation over the Iranian nuclear conflict but in my point of view disregarding Iran's offers west keeps insisting on their failed policy of pressuring Iran to give up its right to have a peaceful nuclear program. western powers neglect Israeli nuclear weapon which is the biggest threat to the region, in fact Israel is trying to reinforce Israel's view that Iran is dangerous to the world 's peace, they want to push west to move one step forward in order to attack Iran. As a matter of fact even Egypt says that nuclear armed Israel is more dangerous than Iran, because Israel is the only country having nuclear weapons in Mid east. Although Iran is not after nuclear weapon at all but from strictly realistic point of view we may need bi polar system to secure peace in the region, just like what we faced in cold war era, I don't advocate starting a nuclear race in the region but as long as Israel is refusing to join NPT and using nuclear weapon as means of deterrent punishment for whoever Israel considers as potential enemy , to create bi-polar middle east may be inevitable. If Israel can follow " if you try to throw us stone, we will kill millions of your poeple" why then not other countries can have such policy? More over we should bear in mind that Israel is acting more preemptively than any other country in the region, we have seen Israelis always strike first against whoever they don't like, Israel uses gun in bare handed fights, and they are holding their guns to the head of every country in the middle east. If it s means of self defence why then not let Iran have such means of self defence?